How lawful is the relation between ICBC & TReO...
ICBC seems to be able to withhold vehicle insurance for unpaid tolls.
As ICBC is the only insurance corporation authorized to issue mandatory basic liability insurance in BC, and subject to mandate to issue said insurance; does the ICBC's refusal to re-new insurance because of the TReO tolls constitute acceptance of liability if the driver proceeds to drive insurance-free?
If not, obviously a preposterous sounding concept, how lawful and on what authority is the relationship between ICBC <-> TReO? I mean is ICBC performing debt-collection services as a 3rd party contractor like any other collection agency? Or is this relationship contained in RSBC? RSC? Any other binding law/statute/regulation?