How do I Deal with the Legal System After a Fatal Collision?

Scales of JusticeHow do I deal with the legal system after my son was killed by a driver who fell asleep at the wheel? This was the plea in my in-box from a mother who was trying to understand in the recent aftermath of a catastrophe. The two haunting concerns that she has right now is that this driver is still legally allowed to drive and the most significant consequence that he might face for causing death is a traffic ticket.

At it’s most basic, the investigation by police will involve the gathering of information about all involved, photographs, witness statements and perhaps a few measurements. A situation like this one should also involve an officer specially trained in collision reconstruction and a commercial vehicle inspector as the offending vehicle was a five ton van. At best, a dedicated crash investigation team that employs many experienced investigators with a wide range of skills could be called to participate.

A quick start and a thorough initial investigation to gather as much information as possible is critical to the outcome of any prosecution of the offending driver. This can take time to complete and then prepare a comprehensive report to Crown Counsel for a decision on appropriate charges.

What happens to the offending driver between the initial incident and the first appearance in court to face charges depends on many things. The severity of the incident, the actions of the driver that led to it, their criminal and driving history and the possibility of repeated similar behaviour in the near future are all considered. It is not uncommon to have an alcoholic driver with previous convictions released by a justice of the peace on a condition not to drive until the conclusion of the case for a current offence and could be considered for an incident such as this one.

In British Columbia, once the police investigation is concluded and a report to Crown Counsel is filed a decision will be made on how to deal with the offence. The Crown Counsel Policy Manual sets out responsibility for decisions and what the possible range of actions might be. Depending on the decision, actions may range from alternate measures, a traffic ticket or criminal prosecution.

Finally, the issue of punishment for the offending driver is dealt with by the courts, assuming that the driver is convicted or pleads guilty. Again, the range of outcomes is extensive, ranging from alternative resolutions, Motor Vehicle Act convictions, and criminal convictions including fines, house arrest and jail sentences. The judge is restricted in applying penalty by case law and the charges that Crown Counsel chooses to prosecute.

RoadSafetyBC, also known as the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles can choose to take action if advised as well. The Superintendent can choose to prohibit a driver when it is in the public interest to do so.

The Criminal Code of Canada says that a person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, they cause the death of a human being. Further, a person commits culpable homicide when they cause the death of a human being by means of an unlawful act or by criminal negligence. A driver is criminally negligent when they show wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.

A commercial driver who must follow hours of service rules and disregards them could be considered to be showing reckless disregard, as well as any driver who is aware that they are excessively fatigued or falling asleep at the wheel and continues to drive.

Reference Link:

I heartily agree with the thoughts expressed on the Hergott Law link.

My wife lost her 19 year old brother, when he was rear ended by a drunk driver at the bottom of 176th, where he was southbound, waiting to turn on 88th.

The guy who hit him had 2 convictions in the previous 5 years, but was allowed to walk with a "slap on the wrist". (I am unsure of what he did get, and the whole topic is enough to ruin today and the next few days, if I DO ask my wife.)

The actions of the drinking driver, crushed my in laws. My wife is scarred for life. Driving past that spot on 176th is a total buzzkill for the day, regardless of how great the day has been up til then. (And my father and mother in law live just a couple blocks from there on 96th, and THEY Have to pass by there from time to time, and I don't know how they do it.)

I was told the driver showed no remorse in court, only expressing relief at his punishment, (I think she said 2 years prohibition and a Fine) which does not in any way reflect on the crime commited.

I sincerely hope, that someday, people will actually be made accountable for their actions. Until that day comes, most people have no compunction to improve, or self govern, their driving habits.

Driving is not a right. It is a priviledge, and a very large responsibility. People's lives are at stake.

The loss of ONE young man, bludgeoned the lives of 5 family members, their children, the husbands and wives of those family members, and who knows how far it will trickle down?

How many people get behind the wheel, and take a moment to clear their mind of things that a bugging them, or think about the responsibility they are going to take on, when they take off?

Every time I get behind the wheel, I see Tony's picture hanging from the visor, and I am faced with the reality that I am going to interact with other drivers, and my conduct could have lifelong repercussions for us all.

I will stop there.