Making Bad Drivers Pay
- Collisions |
- Government |
Last week we looked at how we might define a bad driver. Views were varied, but there were two well thought out responses that did more than just express an opinion. This week, let's look at how bad drivers pay for the risk that they present to others using our highways.
At the top of the list is the Criminal Code of Canada. Part 8 deals with offences against the person and reputation. Here we find homicide, criminal negligence and motor vehicles, vessels & aircraft. These are reserved for the worst of the worst offenders and convictions may result in significant fines and / or time in jail.
Our Motor Vehicle Act and it's associated Regulations create the framework of rules that we are supposed to follow when we drive. Disobey one of these and you might receive a violation ticket with a prescribed fine. The fine amount should reflect the seriousness of the offence, the more dangerous the act, the higher the fine.
There are some problems with this system. First among them is that the fine may be a life altering penalty for those with no financial means and the bite of a gnat for those with significant resources.
Yes, the court system exists to reduce the penalties to be more fair in the circumstances, but my experience there is that those of limited means seldom take advantage of it. Also, there is no provision to increase the fine beyond the prescribed fine in traffic court.
Some countries use a Day Fine system where the penalty is based on the offenders daily income level to make the penalty more appropriate.
If the circumstances are out of the ordinary but do not call for criminal sanctions, the offending driver may be served with an appearance notice instead of a violation ticket. A provincial court judge will hear the case and may apply a variety of penalties on conviction. These may range from probation orders to fines, prohibitions from driving and jail sentences.
The second problem that comes to mind is the high threshold for sanction of experienced bad drivers in the Driver Improvement Program.
Additions to the penalty system include the Immediate Roadside Prohibition program (IRP) for alcohol and drug impaired drivers and the Vehicle Impoundment program for the IRP, excessive speeding, driving while unlicensed, prohibited or suspended, stunting and not being seated properly on a motorcycle.
The Driver Penalty Point Premium is based on driving convictions and paid to ICBC each year. The more penalty points you are assigned, the more you pay. This part of the Motor Vehicle Act Regulations is overdue for revision. A red light conviction is 2 points, as is parking next to a yellow curb if you are ticketed for disobeying a traffic control device.
The Driver Risk Premium is meant to penalize drivers who have shown that they present a significant danger others through a driving related Criminal Code conviction, a 10 penalty point violation, excessive speeding or a distracted driving conviction.
If you are an at fault driver in a collision, you will either lose your safe driving insurance discount or the possibility of forgiveness should you experience another at fault collision.
Finally, the courts, RoadSafetyBC in Part 2 or the roadside prohibition requirements of Part 4 of the Motor Vehicle Act serve to remove driving priviliges entirely as a penalty.
This is quite an array of possibilities, isn't it? With all of this in place, one wonders why there are still so much bad driving behaviour on our roads.
Making streets safer is conditional on be caught
I live in the South Okanagan, perhaps it's unique to this area, but it's common to drive for several hours up and down Hwy 97 and not see one police car. In addition the police car, if seen may be a general duty member returning to his area from court, there's certainly no guarantee that every police car has the priority of traffic.
Is there a problem with staffing ? Is there a problem with paper work ? Is something keeping members off the streets and away from duties where they interact with the public ?
What has happened with our laws in the last several years ?
"Distracted Driving". It has always been illegal, well for many many decades. It was enforced under Driving Without Due Care and Attention. BUT, to obtain grounds a police officer had to secure evidence.
Too hard, so our government enacted new legislation, that made it illegal to basically touch an electronic device.
What else has happened ? Impaired and Over 80 mg, has virtually been replaced in BC with the IRP.
There was lots of talk that the IRP would only be used for non collision events, ya,,,, right.
It changed a criminal investigation that could take some members the balance of a shift to complete (and likely loose in court) to a situation where the member is the crown witness, the judge, and the issuer of sanctions (oh, no all the money that it costs, which can be in the $4000 range, you'll be happy to know isn't a punitive fine, it's a sanction)
Now there's talk about adding speeding detections to red light cameras, and also some take of returning to photo radar. There's also take of automatic speeding tickets when vehicles travel a certain distance under a certain time.
Where are the police ?? Aren't they, or,,,, didn't they used to be the foundation of traffic enforcement ????
All well to say "Make Bad Driver's Pay", but they have to be caught by police first. Well unless you think issuing a Registered Owner Summons, is making a bad driver pay.
Submitted by E-Mail
I just recently renewed my 2014 Camry car insurance for another year, only it cost me $1,102.00, and that included the safe driving discount, so I also share your frustration. However, although it is easy to blame the new government and ICBC for setting such high rates, they are probably determined by actuarial tables rather than people, and, if anyone is to blame, it’s the people who drive in BC – the incredibly large number of claims submitted last year I thought was astonishing!