Can You Drive Your Jeep Without Doors in BC? The Legal Reality

BC Courts Coat of ArmsA BC Provincial Court case, R. v. Dolson (2014), officially put the spotlight on whether aftermarket "Adventure Doors" are legal on BC highways. Here is what you need to know before you strip down your rig.

Update March 14, 2025: According to the Kamloops court registry, this conviction was overturned on appeal. This judgment has not been published. Please note that having a decision overturned does NOT mean that it is legal to use tube doors! Enforcement officers can still issue tickets based on current provincial vehicle safety regulations.

The Backstory: What Happened?

A driver named Philip Hamish Dolson was ticketed in Kamloops, BC, while driving his Jeep Wrangler. Instead of the standard factory doors, his Jeep was equipped with aftermarket Warrior Products "Adventure Doors." These are popular tube-style doors made of steel pipes with open spaces in between.

Aftermarket tube door installed on a red Jeep Wrangler
An example of aftermarket tube doors similar to the ones involved in the court case.

Mr. Dolson argued that his tube doors were safe, had functioning hinges, latches, and handles, and should be legally allowed. The police argued they breached the BC Motor Vehicle Act Regulations.

The Initial Legal Arguments

Though the conviction was later overturned on appeal, the parameters outlined in the initial trial highlight the strict safety standards enforced on public highways. The court raised several key points regarding why aftermarket tube doors struggle to comply with BC regulations:

  • The "As Manufactured" Rule: BC law states that if a vehicle is originally manufactured with doors, it must have doors installed while operating on a highway. This refers to the original factory doors or identical solid replacements, not structural substitutes.
  • Tube Doors are "Gates," Not Doors: The trial court defined a legal car door as a solid barrier. Because tube doors are just a series of open pipes, they were classified as gates rather than actual doors.
  • Exhaust Gas Hazards: BC vehicle inspection laws state that door seals must prevent toxic exhaust fumes from leaking into the passenger cab. Open tube doors make this impossible.
  • Side-Impact Protection: Factory doors are engineered with structural sheet metal, side-intrusion beams, and sometimes airbags to protect you in a crash. Tube doors lack these highway-rated safety metrics.
  • Advertised Use: Even the manufacturer's own website stated that Adventure Doors were designed to provide extra protection while off-roading—not for commuting on asphalt.

The Hidden Violation: The Mirror Trap

Even if an enforcement officer overlooks the missing doors, taking them off usually triggers a secondary equipment infraction. Commercial Vehicle Safety and Enforcement (CVSE Bulletin 06-13) notes that the vast majority of Jeep side mirrors are physically attached directly to the factory door assemblies. Operating on a highway without a functional driver's side rear-view mirror directly violates MVAR Division 7.04(2).

What Counts as a "Highway" in BC?

You cannot bypass these safety rules by staying off major freeways. Under BC law, a highway is defined incredibly broadly. It includes:

  • All public streets, roads, and lanes.
  • Public parking lots.
  • Private property to which the public has clear access or invitation.

The Takeaway for Jeep Owners

  • Off-Road Only: Tube doors and doorless driving are completely fine when you are strictly on private off-road properties or dedicated trail networks.
  • Trailered or Swapped: If you want to use tube doors on the trail, you must transport your Jeep on a trailer or keep your factory doors on until you reach the staging area.
  • The Pre-1986 Exception: The only Jeeps generally exempt from this rule are vintage Jeep CJs manufactured before 1986, as CVSE recognizes some configurations left the factory with doors listed as optional equipment.

Keep those factory doors latched tight until your tires hit the dirt.

Share This Article

Help keep fellow off-roaders informed and ticket-free on BC roads. Use the options below to share this legal breakdown with your local 4x4 community or Jeep club.

Comments

You might want to update this, as I just had a conversation with someone who was operating on the assumption that tube doors were okay because of the claim here the decision was overturned.

From a properly connected person:

"I was able to look up what happened on appeal. It seems it was never heard on the merits but that Mr Dolson made a deal to plead to speeding in exchange for the door ticket being dropped."

This means the provincial court decision remains good law and the proper advice to give to jeepers is to keep your factory doors on while on roads or FSRs."

Unfortunately, a search of Supreme Court decisions does not find a result. This means either the information that it was appealed is not correct or the decision was not reported.

This is a good illustration of making a decision based on incomplete information. While the decision might have been overturned on appeal, it is not confirmation that the accused did not break the law. Sometimes it is dismissed because the Crown did not prove the case sufficiently.

In this case, it was a Crown counsel who passed on the information, so I'd tend to trust what he told me... which narrows it down to "the decision was not reported".

But you are correct, it's a good illustration of the perils of making decisions based on incomplete information.

Visitor Survey

Have a specific traffic law question?  Please use our Question Submission Form instead.


Primary Reason for Visit
Did you find the information you were looking for today?
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.