CASE LAW - Bro v Superintendent of Motor Vehicles
The Honourable Mr. Justice Macaulay hears the constitutional argument against the current Immediate Roadside Prohibition laws in BC. He decides "... that the salutary effects of the IRP regime far outweigh the alleged deleterious effects. Any violation of s. 8 is, as a result, saved under s. 1. This allows the continued use of the IRP to deal with impaired drivers on our highways.