CASE LAW - R v Rhone

BC Courts Coat of ArmsKelly Rae Rhone was charged for operating a motor vehicle without proper insurance while driving on the Trans Canada Highway at Mill Bay, B.C. Ms. Rhone disputed the traffic ticket on the basis that keeping the insurance current was her husband's job and that she did not know the insurance was expired. She held the honest belief that the vehicle was insured when she began her journey that day.

Judicial Justice Gordon found " I conclude that simply leaving it to her husband to look after the renewal of insurance of a vehicle of which she is the principal operator is not sufficient reasonable care for this regulatory offence.  I therefore conclude Ms. Rhone did not take the requisite reasonable care to determine if the Tahoe was insured under a liability policy when she drove it on May 4, 2011, nor did she take reasonable steps to avoid doing so."

Link:

Read the Reasons for Judgment - R v Rhone

Visitor Survey

Need a reply? This survey is for anonymous feedback. If you have a question and require a personal response, please use our Contact Form instead.


Primary Reason for Visit
Did you find the information you were looking for today?
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.