Q&A - Accident or ??
Am I the only one who has been intrigued by the Law Firms who post advertisements seeking witnesses to "accidents"?
It would seem that, by that terminology, they have just weakened their client's case by admitting that it was "accidental". Should that determination not be made by the Court?
Occasionally, we see such advertisements referring to a "crash", "collision" or "incident" all of which may be correct but do not give away arguments about responsibility.
Think about it. If you were involved in a "coming together" and hiring a Lawyer, would you want one who has already pre-judged the situation as "accidental"?